Comments on “Anonymous reviews”

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comments on FHH Anonymous Multireceiver Encryption

Recently, Fan et al. proposed an anonymous multireceiver encryption scheme (FHH) , and they declared that their scheme achieves confidentiality and anonymity. In this letter, We point out that the FHH scheme does not hold the defined security properties. In particular, we state that the FHH scheme does not hold the anonymity but achieves the weaker confidentiality of IND-CPA.

متن کامل

Comments on two anonymous conference key distribution systems

In this paper we consider the security of two recently proposed anonymous conference key distribution schemes. We show that neither scheme is as practical as the authors claim and that, in certain circumstances, both schemes also suffer from security vulnerabilities. We also show that the attack described in one paper is invalid.

متن کامل

Comments on Chang-Lee’s Anonymous E-Voting Scheme

In recent years, several electronic voting (e-voting) schemes for communication networks have been proposed. In 2006, Chang and Lee presented an anonymous electronic voting scheme which can be applied in real-world elections. However, this paper shows that Chang-Lee’s e-voting scheme suffers from susceptibility to security attacks and, as a result, some essential security requirements of their ...

متن کامل

Response to Anonymous Referee #2’s comments

The 880 nm group samples collected under high relative humidity condition showed high scattering coefficient at 550 nm and sulfate mass concentrations. In general, relative humidity (RH) influences the water content of aerosol particles through hygroscopic growth, which changes their optical properties. Not to mention, hygroscopic growth of sulfate aerosols must have increased scattering coeffi...

متن کامل

Incentivizing anonymous “peer-to-peer” reviews

The review cycle for papers takes way too long in many disciplines. The problem is that while authors want to have their own papers reviewed fast, that are often unwilling to review the papers of others in a timely manner. This paper explores what would be required to incentivize fast reviews using a public reputation/scoring system that exploits the fact that the referees are drawn from the sa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union

سال: 2003

ISSN: 0096-3941

DOI: 10.1029/2003eo390008